Who has the most OnlyFans subs — and what it means for you

If you’ve been quietly googling “who has the most subs on OnlyFans” and then immediately comparing yourself… yeah. I get it.

I’m MaTitie (editor at Top10Fans), and I work with creators who are smart, capable, and still feel a bit shaky around pricing, positioning, and “am I doing enough?”. If that sounds like you, I want to take the pressure off straight away:

There isn’t a reliable, public, always-updated leaderboard for “most subscribers on OnlyFans”.
So when people claim “X has the most subs”, it’s usually based on hints, marketing, screenshots (sometimes outdated), or a mix of fame + viral moments + estimated earnings.

That might feel frustrating, but it’s also freeing—because it means you don’t need to chase a possibly imaginary #1 to build a real, sustainable income.

Below, I’ll break down what we can responsibly say about “most subs”, what signals actually matter, and how you (an Aussie creator building a personal brand and trying not to second-guess every price) can use this info without getting dragged into toxic comparison.

Why “most subs” is hard to verify (and why that’s normal)

OnlyFans doesn’t publish a public ranking of subscriber counts. Creators can share numbers, but:

• Subscriber counts can change daily (promos, trials, churn).
• “Subscribers” might include discounted subs, bundle subs, or temporary promos.
• Some creators bundle free/cheap entry and monetise via PPV; others keep a higher sub price and sell less PPV.
• Screenshots can be real but outdated, selectively framed, or missing context.

So the more accurate question usually becomes:

“Who’s best at attracting paying attention at scale?”

Because on OnlyFans, the biggest subscription engines tend to be creators who can reliably generate:

• traffic (from socials, press, collabs, search, shoutouts),
• conversion (a page that turns visitors into subscribers),
• retention (posting rhythm, messaging, content planning),
• monetisation depth (PPV, tips, bundles, customs, live, perks).

Subscriber count is only one slice of that.

What the public conversation is pointing to in 2025

In the creator-news cycle and social chatter, certain names are repeatedly framed as “dominant” in the market—often because they’re highly visible and run viral, divisive moments on purpose. In the “stunt + virality” lane, Bonnie Blue and Lily Phillips are frequently mentioned as standout operators for 2025.

Important nuance (especially if you’re shy, brand-conscious, or just not into chaos):
High visibility doesn’t automatically mean the highest subscriber count. It often means:

• the highest reach,
• the highest search demand,
• and the highest conversation volume.

That can correlate with subs, but it isn’t the same thing.

If you’re the type of creator who wants to build quietly, with control and confidence (not stress and constant escalation), this is good news: you can win without playing that game.

The “OnlyGrans” angle: a reminder that “top” isn’t one look or one life stage

One of the most useful perspectives I’ve seen lately isn’t about who’s #1—it’s about why different creators join and what they actually need from the platform.

There’s been attention on older creators—sometimes called “OnlyGrans”—who are carving out their own lane:

• Michelle Hardenbrook (72) described joining to survive financially under rising living costs, speaking in practical, no-glamour terms about vulnerability and planning for emergencies.
• Petra Daniels (68) spoke about attention, connection, and being seen—after injury and a rough run of feeling overlooked elsewhere.
• Caroline Vee has been reported as earning around $36k a month, after entering a saturated market later in life and building consistency over time.

Even if your personal situation is totally different, the lesson is the same:
OnlyFans isn’t one single “top creator” story. It’s thousands of different motivations—money, autonomy, confidence, safety, recovery, reinvention—each with a strategy that fits.

For you, especially if you’re cutting off toxic dynamics and trying to back yourself without guilt, I’d underline this:

Your strategy should protect your nervous system, not just your stats.

So… who has the most subs on OnlyFans?

Here’s the honest answer that won’t waste your time:

No one outside OnlyFans can confirm a definitive #1 by subscriber count.

What we can do is talk about probable leaders by public signals, and more importantly, how to interpret those signals for your own growth.

Creators most often rumoured to have extremely high subscriber numbers are typically those with:

• mainstream fame (existing audience),
• relentless social media distribution,
• frequent collabs,
• strong PR/viral cycles,
• aggressive promo pricing and funnel design.

But if your goal is: steady income, confident pricing, and a brand you can live with, then chasing “most subs” is rarely the best KPI.

A more creator-friendly set of KPIs looks like:

• Net monthly income
• Churn (how many subs stay)
• Conversion rate (visits → paid subs)
• Revenue per fan (sub + PPV + tips)
• Content sustainability (can you keep it up without spiralling?)

The part you actually care about: what “top subs” teaches you about pricing (without panic)

You mentioned feeling low confidence about pricing. That’s common for smart people, honestly—especially if you’re analytical and you can see 30 different ways a number might be “wrong”.

Here’s a steadier way to think about it:

1) Subscriber count is a pricing outcome, not a moral score

If someone has more subs, it doesn’t mean they’re better. It often means they picked (or tested into) a price that matches their traffic source and audience expectations.

2) Most “big sub” strategies are built on one of two models

Model A: Low entry price, high volume, monetise later

• Lower barrier to subscribe
• More subs, more chat volume, more PPV opportunities
• Requires strong systems (boundaries, templates, posting plan)

Model B: Higher entry price, lower volume, premium positioning

• Fewer subs, usually more deliberate fans
• Less chat overwhelm
• Requires brand clarity and consistent perceived value

If you’re shy and a bit nervous, Model B can feel safer emotionally. But Model A can still work if you design strong boundaries (more on that below).

3) Pricing confidence comes from testing, not “being ready”

You don’t have to “deserve” a price. You set a hypothesis, test it, and adjust without self-judgement.

A gentle testing approach (especially if you’re anxious):

• Keep your base sub price steady for 2–4 weeks.
• Change only one variable at a time (price or posting frequency or promo offer).
• Track: new subs, renewals, PPV open rate, and your own stress level.

Yes—your stress level is a metric. Burnout silently kills revenue.

What viral “top creators” do that you can copy (without copying their stunts)

Even if you never do divisive moments, you can still borrow the mechanics behind their growth:

1) They’re consistent with “entry points”

They make it easy to understand:

• what you get,
• why it’s worth it,
• what happens after subscribing.

For you: a simple, calm page promise can outperform a chaotic one. Think:

• “Daily posts + weekly themed sets”
• “Chat-friendly, but respectful boundaries”
• “Girlfriend vibe, marketing brain, no pressure”

2) They build repeatable content series

Series reduce decision fatigue. If you’re juggling work and emotions, series are a gift. Examples (non-explicit, brand-friendly):

• “Office-to-night” aesthetic sets
• “Weekly confidence diary” (fans love story arcs)
• “Marketing mind” behind-the-scenes (your edge: economics + digital marketing)

3) They protect retention with rhythm

Retention is where income stabilises. A predictable schedule beats occasional bursts.

A sustainable rhythm could be:

• 3 feed posts/week
• 1 larger set/week
• 1 “soft check-in” message/week
• 1 PPV drop/fortnight (only if it feels aligned)

You can scale up later. Stability first.

Safety and boundaries: growth shouldn’t come with fear

One of the news items circulating (dated 25 Jan 2026) described an OnlyFans influencer reported missing and later found safe. Without rehashing details, it’s a reminder that visibility can bring risks, and creators deserve safety planning alongside marketing.

Practical, non-alarmist safety habits:

• Keep private details private (location patterns, daily routines, identifiable places).
• Separate personal and creator contact channels.
• Be cautious with “real-time” posting.
• Consider a PO box or third-party address for any fan mail (if you ever allow it).
• Trust your gut about anyone pushing boundaries.

If you’re in a season of cutting off toxic relationships, this matters even more: your platform boundaries can reinforce your life boundaries. It’s all the same muscle.

AI content, “automation”, and the mental load question

Another story (also 25 Jan 2026) touched on an OnlyFans rival and a strange, concerning “AI psychosis” angle. I’m not going to dramatise it—but I will pull out the creator lesson:

AI can help your workflow, but it shouldn’t replace your sense of reality

If you’re already a bit nervous, the wrong automation stack can make you feel:

• behind,
• paranoid about competition,
• or disconnected from what your fans actually like.

If you use AI, keep it grounded:

• Use it for caption drafts, content calendars, and message templates.
• Don’t use it to impersonate intimacy you can’t deliver.
• Don’t let it pressure you into posting more than you can sustain.

Your brand is trust. Protect it.

“Most subs” vs “most stable”: what I’d want for you (and why)

If you’re experimenting with personal creator branding and you’re unsure about pricing, the healthiest goal usually isn’t “most subs”.

It’s something like:

• “Predictable income with respectful fans.”
• “A brand I’m proud of in six months.”
• “Enough growth that I don’t have to tolerate toxic people.”

Creators who last tend to build a business that supports their life, not one that constantly consumes it.

And yes, I’ll say the quiet part out loud: some high-visibility growth tactics can attract high-volume attention that feels awful. You’re allowed to want a calmer lane.

A practical way to answer the question for yourself: “Who is closest to the top in my niche?”

Instead of hunting a global #1, try this creator-friendly approach:

Step 1: Define your niche in one sentence

Examples:

• “Soft, elegant girlfriend vibe with playful marketing wit”
• “Gym + lifestyle + teasing storytelling”
• “Cosy, chatty, low-drama, premium feel”

Step 2: Identify 5–10 “peer leaders”

Not mega-celebs. People whose:

• content style resembles yours,
• posting pace looks doable,
• audience feels similar.

Step 3: Compare systems, not bodies or personalities

Look for:

• their bundle offers,
• their posting cadence,
• their pinned post structure,
• how they tease value without overpromising,
• how they handle boundaries.

That’s the stuff you can ethically learn from.

If you want help doing this without spiralling, that’s exactly the kind of analysis we do at Top10Fans. If it suits you, you can join the Top10Fans global marketing network—free—and keep it low-pressure.

A gentle pricing framework (for when you’re second-guessing yourself)

When you feel that “I’m not sure I’m worth it” wobble, try this:

Pick one of these starting positions for 30 days

• Steady starter: a comfortable price you won’t resent, with consistent posting
• Premium calm: slightly higher price, fewer promises, higher quality sets
• Growth funnel: lower price + clear PPV plan + strict chat boundaries

Then write down:

• What you’ll post (in plain language)
• How often
• What you will not do (this is important)

A boundary list might include:

• “No custom requests that make me feel gross.”
• “No last-minute demands.”
• “No guilt discounts.”

You’re allowed to be kind and still be firm.

If you still want a “name”: how to hold it lightly

If someone tells you “X has the most subs”, treat it as entertainment-level information, not a business benchmark.

In 2025 chatter, Bonnie Blue and Lily Phillips are frequently framed as dominant forces because they understand virality. That doesn’t mean their path is the right template for you, and it doesn’t mean you’re failing if you don’t want that intensity.

Your win condition can be quieter:

• fewer subscribers,
• better renewals,
• higher revenue per fan,
• a healthier day-to-day.

That is a real win.

📚 Further reading (if you want the wider context)

If you’d like to see the related reporting and conversations that informed parts of this discussion, these are a few places to start:

🔸 Curvy OnlyFans model found alive and in good health
🗞️ Source: New York Post – 📅 2026-01-25
🔗 Read the article

🔸 OnlyFans rival and ‘AI psychosis’ concerns
🗞️ Source: Futurism – 📅 2026-01-25
🔗 Read the article

🔸 El exilio de Jean Pierre, estrella de OnlyFans
🗞️ Source: Milenio – 📅 2026-01-25
🔗 Read the article

📌 Quick heads-up (disclaimer)

This post blends publicly available information with a touch of AI assistance.
It’s for sharing and discussion only — not all details are officially verified.
If anything looks off, ping me and I’ll fix it.